theoretical frame

My theoretical frame stems from The Plantation Model created by Billy Hawkins. The plantation model has several pillars however the foundation lies on the overemphasis of athletics in black communities. The backbone of this system lies in the mass media propaganda depicting sports as an accessible path for young black kids to achieve social status and class mobility. Hawkins claimed that as a male growing up in one of these communities "if you did not compete in athletics, your masculinity was questioned; consequently, if you made “too many” good grades, your masculinity was questioned" (Hawkins 5). These kids grow up seeing their idols playing on tv dreaming to be just like them, not knowing that once making it onto a college team, the chance of making it be a professional is around 1%. 
The first pillar is the idea of oscillating migrant laborers in which the players are forced to sell their labor and utilize their skills in hopes of improving their financial conditions back at home. This term refers to Mexican Migrant laborers, who historically were allowed to sell their labor cheaply in the United States as these migrant laborers because their actual home communities were extremely poor. Ironically, though, these athlete laborers are given no opportunity to bring money back to their home communities while in college. It is only if they make it as professionals that they will be able to transform the lives of their families and home communities by sending money to them, essentially (in much the way that migrant laborers bring back valuable money to their communities). For the vast majority, though, who don't make it as professionals, there is a big chance that they will bring nothing back. The term oscillating refers to the two completely different lifestyles they live at school compared to when they're home. Many of the division 1 athletes are near to or below poverty and then are treated like celebrities at school. They are provided with barbershops and flat-screen TVs in their locker rooms but are not compensated monetarily at all, leaving many to couch surf their friends' apartments. By giving the athletes a glimpse of what happens when you work hard, the goal is to keep the athletes working to their utmost ability to eventually achieve this lifestyle. 
The ownership of college athletes stems from the NCAA owning all rights against these athletes due to their amateur rules. The term amateurism is used by the NCAA to symbolize “paternalistic protection,” or in other words ownership. In order to play a sport in the NCAA, athletes must sign a significant number of papers, essentially giving colleges all the rights of profiting off of the student’s image. In this way, the athletes do all the work and the universities and the NCAA make all the profits. This is further discussed in the case of O’Bannon vs NCAA.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HELLO WELCOME TO MY RESEARCH IDEAS BLOG     On the Privatization OF COLLEGEEEE!!!!! Idea #1- College Sports        Athletes many times go to school for free        California recently legalized paying college athletes- big controversy         A lot of money goes into it        Large factor of where students choose to go to school, ex. schools down south are bigger on sports Idea #2- undecided
Read more

counter argument

Argument- Black student-athletes are treated as Migrant Laborers exploited for their athletic ability by the NCAA via the Plantation Model.  The leverage of the NCAA over these athletes stems from the overemphasis of sports in black communities leading to an enormous pool of overzealous applicants each year. Counter- Despite the corrupt nature of the NCAA, it provides players with a form of self-empowerment through academic achievement and the overall feeling of self-worth (especially if you are the first person in your family to graduate college). It also helps one build an identity and help make connections in the world beyond a small community. Overall, gaining a college degree, in general, is very beneficial in today's society and incrementally benefits those of low-income families more than those of the middle class. Additionally, there is always the chance of falling into the one percent that makes it and succeeds in the NFL/NBA and gets paid millions of dollars.
Read more
I would like to narrow down my research paper to whether college athletes should get paid and talk about the state of California being the first to allow this, even though it does not go into effect until 2023. I will look in to see if other states are willing to follow in the footsteps of California. If so why or why not. A common argument for not getting paid is that these athletes are putting everything of theirs on the line - their physical health, mental health, their future careers (if sports does work out), and lastly, their time. With this also comes the question of should they get paid for commercials/ brand deal at least since it is essentially face and their brand. Can college pay athletes for one and not the other? The other argument is that when it comes down to it, college is a place for education and many times, these high ranked athletes are going and getting degrees at the major universities for free. Is that not enough to count as a salary? https://www.npr.org/2019/
Read more